[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170401175435.GA12354@dtor-ws>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 10:54:35 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] i2c: make sure i2c_master_send/recv return negative error
codes
There is theoretical possibility that i2c_master_send() and
i2c_master_recv() may return non-negative result on error: we pass
return values from i2c_xfer() unmodified to the caller, unless we
transferred exactly 1 message. Let's ensure we always return negative on
error.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
index 6efeba42d10b..34b0482333f4 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
@@ -2835,7 +2835,10 @@ int i2c_master_send(const struct i2c_client *client, const void *buf, int count)
* If everything went ok (i.e. 1 msg transmitted), return #bytes
* transmitted, else error code.
*/
- return (ret == 1) ? count : ret;
+ if (likely(ret == 1))
+ return count;
+
+ return ret < 0 ? ret : -EIO;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_master_send);
@@ -2865,7 +2868,10 @@ int i2c_master_recv(const struct i2c_client *client, void *buf, int count)
* If everything went ok (i.e. 1 msg received), return #bytes received,
* else error code.
*/
- return (ret == 1) ? count : ret;
+ if (likely(ret == 1))
+ return count;
+
+ return ret < 0 ? ret : -EIO;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_master_recv);
--
2.12.2.564.g063fe858b8-goog
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists