[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k2728lrp.fsf_-_@xmission.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 17:52:58 -0500
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Aleksa Sarai <asarai@...e.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Attila Fazekas <afazekas@...hat.com>,
Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH v2 3/5] clone: Disallown CLONE_THREAD with a shared sighand_struct
Old threading libraries used CLONE_SIGHAND without clone thread.
Modern threadding libraries always use CLONE_SIGHAND | CLONE_THREAD.
Therefore let's simplify our lives and stop supporting a case no one cares about.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
kernel/fork.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index fe6f1bf32bb9..0632ac1180be 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1515,6 +1515,13 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
if ((clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD) && !(clone_flags & CLONE_SIGHAND))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ /* Disallow CLONE_THREAD with a shared SIGHAND structure. No
+ * one cares and supporting it leads to unnecessarily complex
+ * code.
+ */
+ if ((clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD) && (atomic_read(¤t->sighand->count) > 1))
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
/*
* Shared signal handlers imply shared VM. By way of the above,
* thread groups also imply shared VM. Blocking this case allows
--
2.10.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists