[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170403110127.asqdxbyny63bpr67@piout.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 13:01:27 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Daniel Schultz <d.schultz@...tec.de>
Cc: a.zummo@...ertech.it, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver: rtc: tps65910: Add parameter check
Hi,
On 15/03/2017 at 11:52:32 +0100, Daniel Schultz wrote:
> If the tps65910 driver has no interrupt, the probe of tps65910-rtc will
> fail.
>
> This patch adds a check in the probe of the rtc if an interrupt exist.
> The check is similar to the check in the function which creates the
> interrupt.
>
Can you elaborate on what this is fixing? If the probe already fails I'm
not sure why your patch is also making it fail.
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Schultz <d.schultz@...tec.de>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c
> index d0244d7..8c5ca11 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c
> @@ -375,6 +375,11 @@ static int tps65910_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> tps65910 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
>
> + if (!tps65910->chip_irq) {
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "No interrupt support, not created\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> tps_rtc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct tps65910_rtc),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!tps_rtc)
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists