[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1491230017.708.108.camel@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 14:33:37 +0000
From: "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: "p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
CC: "mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com" <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ramiro.Oliveira@...opsys.com" <Ramiro.Oliveira@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] reset: Make optional stuff optional for all users
On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 17:31 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 16:27 +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> >
> > > int rstc_id;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > - if (!node)
> > > - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > -
> >
> > This should be
> >
> > if (!node)
> > return optional ? NULL : ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> >
> > instead. Can you confirm this works for Intel boards with DW UART? I
> > can
> > fix it up when applying if you agree.
>
> I don't think it worth to change. I specifically checked all of_*
> calls
> in that function and they cope pretty nice with node == NULL.
>
> So, I rather to go with my initial change.
>
Hit Enter before closing another thought.
When you come with solution where this __of_reset_control_get() will be
called only for node != NULL case you will not need that check either.
So, I would go my solution because of two benefits:
- it fixes bug
- if will not bring ping-ponging code
> Thanks for review!
>
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists