[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170403002010.GJ29622@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 01:20:11 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs fixes
On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 04:59:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > statx followup fixes, fix for a nasty corner case in path_init()
> > leaving path.dentry in RCU mode pointing to a dentry without DCACHE_RCUACCESS
> > and a fix for stack-smashing on alpha.
>
> These were apparently committed minutes before sending me the pull request.
>
> Why?
The first two used to sit on a branch that predated statx merge into mainline,
the rest obviously depends on statx.
> What kind of testing did this all get?
xfstests/ltp for the last part (-rc4 based branch with statx), same + Dmitry's
reproducer for path_init() crap, trivial test for alpha old_adjtimex().
My apologies for rebase; if anything, it would've been cleaner to cherry-pick
the old pair of fixes on top of statx series.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists