[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170403152403.uqjtwe33s7s6l7ib@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:24:03 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Christopher Bostic <cbostic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, linux@...linux.org.uk, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mingo@...hat.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
joel@....id.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...id.au,
alistair@...ple.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/23] drivers/fsi: Add documentation for GPIO bindings
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:43:29PM -0500, Christopher Bostic wrote:
> From: Chris Bostic <cbostic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Add fsi master gpio device tree binding documentation
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Bostic <cbostic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi-master-gpio.txt | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi-master-gpio.txt
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
But what happened to the bus description? There's never a need to
describe slave devices (even discoverable buses like USB and PCI still
need them sometimes)? As it stands now, I have no idea what FSI is from
reading bindings/fsi/*.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists