linux-kernel - question about concurrent regmap i2c usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <76471664-425b-c386-3ad8-efeabc2eaf7e@analog.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Apr 2017 10:28:23 +0200
From:   Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>
To:     <broonie@...nel.org>, <", linus.walleij"@linaro.org>,
        <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC:     <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: question about concurrent regmap i2c usage

Hi Mark,

During the discussion here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/4/76

A question came up, regarding whether it's recommended to mix regmap_i2c 
and plain i2c_smbus or direct adapter transfers.

In this specific case for the i2c MUX portion we need to avoid double 
locks, and therefore use un-locked direct adapter transfers.

The same time we also implement a small gpiochip, where we would like to 
use regmap to avoid some boilerplate code for the register cache.

What is your thought on this?

-- 
Greetings,
Michael

--
Analog Devices GmbH      Otl-Aicher Strasse 60-64      80807 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft München, Registergericht München HRB 40368,
Geschäftsführer: Peter Kolberg, Ali Raza Husain, Eileen Wynne