[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN6PR1201MB0131F022077C5B0E796EB2FBF80B0@BN6PR1201MB0131.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 15:08:42 +0000
From: "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mce/AMD: Carve out SMCA bank configuration
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:bp@...en8.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 11:01 AM
> To: Ghannam, Yazen <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>
> Cc: linux-edac@...r.kernel.org; Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>;
> x86@...nel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mce/AMD: Carve out SMCA bank configuration
>
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 02:37:34PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> > No, not at the moment. This patch is just to help with readability.
>
> Then no need to have two separate functions just because stuff is logically
> independent. Add a comment over the SMCA configuration part in case we
> want to carve it out later.
>
Okay, will do.
Thanks,
Yazen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists