[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 19:08:28 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: silead_dmi - do not treat all devices
as i2c_clients
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 04:45:05PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
>> <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
>> > I2C bus has both i2c clients and adapter devices, so we must be careful in
>> > notifier code and verify that we are actually dealing with an i2c client
>> > before using it as such.
>>
>> > -static void silead_ts_dmi_add_props(struct device *dev)
>> > +static void silead_ts_dmi_add_props(struct i2c_client *client)
>> > {
>>
>> > - struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>>
>> I would replace this by
>> struct device *dev = &client->dev;
>>
>> Otherwise looks good for me.
>
> Andy, this series looks like a candidate for 4.11-fixes. We're already at rc5
> though, so if we are going to do that, I'd like to see a stronger statement in
> the commit log about how this issue manifests currently - if it does.
It makes less changes for any (potentially) backported code.
I'm not insisting and even can do myself.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists