[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:23:12 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: "dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
vireshk@...nel.org
Subject: Re: dmaengine: dw-dmac: Custom cyclic API (Why?)
On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 13:56 +0000, Jose Abreu wrote:
> On 02-01-2017 11:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 15:48 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 10:38:00AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2016-12-30 at 12:05 +0000, Jose Abreu wrote:
> > Actually we have AVR32 connected to our lab. So, I can test it
> > there,
> > but I rather need a patch to use some dummy stub instead of codec
> > (it
> > has no codec connected).
> >
>
> Thank you all for the info. I don't have the HW ready to test yet
> (I was collecting some info first), but when I do I can test on
> my side using Designware I2S and ALSA SoC DMA engine.
Just TWIMC, AVR32 is going to be removed from kernel.
It means in particularly I will follow up and remove related bits in
dw_dmac driver, including custom cyclic API.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists