[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:13:06 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Add additional consistency check
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Yes, but we do not have to blow the kernel, right? Why cannot we simply
> leak that memory?
Because it is a serious bug to attempt to free a non slab object using
slab operations. This is often the result of memory corruption, coding
errs etc. The system needs to stop right there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists