linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] printk: Introduce per-console filtering of messages by loglevel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170405235304.unuljlwluw7wzktf@Haydn>
Date:   Wed, 5 Apr 2017 16:53:04 -0700
From:   Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Jiri Slaby" <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Manuel Schölling <manuel.schoelling@....de>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] printk: Introduce per-console filtering of
 messages by loglevel

On Tuesday 04/04 at 23:27 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 11:16:28 +0900
> Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> > one more thing.
> > 
> > this per-console filtering ignores... the "ignore_loglevel" param.
> > 
> > early_param("ignore_loglevel", ignore_loglevel_setup);
> > module_param(ignore_loglevel, bool, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(ignore_loglevel,
> > 		 "ignore loglevel setting (prints all kernel messages to the console)");
> > 
> > 
> > my preference would be preserve "ignore_loglevel" behaviour. if
> > we are forced to 'ignore all loglevel filtering' then we should
> > do so.
> 
> Agreed.

Makes sense, I'll add then when I resend.

Thanks,
Calvin
 
> -- Steve
>