[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1491385427.2381.58.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:43:47 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com,
minghsiu.tsai@...iatek.com, nick@...anahar.org,
songjun.wu@...rochip.com, hverkuil@...all.nl,
Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@...tor.com>, pavel@....cz,
robert.jarzmik@...e.fr, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
markus.heiser@...marIT.de,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com, shuah@...nel.org,
linux@...linux.org.uk, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com, arnd@...db.de, mchehab@...nel.org,
bparrot@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org, horms+renesas@...ge.net.au,
tiffany.lin@...iatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jean-christophe.trotin@...com,
kernel@...gutronix.de, fabio.estevam@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [media] imx: assume MEDIA_ENT_F_ATV_DECODER entities
output video on pad 1
On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 15:11 -0700, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
>
> On 03/30/2017 10:25 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > The TVP5150 DT bindings specify a single output port (port 0) that
> > corresponds to the video output pad (pad 1, DEMOD_PAD_VID_OUT).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
> > ---
> > I'm trying to get this to work with a TVP5150 analog TV decoder, and the
> > first problem is that this device doesn't have pad 0 as its single
> > output pad. Instead, as a MEDIA_ENT_F_ATV_DECODER entity, it has for
> > pads (input, video out, vbi out, audio out), and video out is pad 1,
> > whereas the device tree only defines a single port (0).
>
> Shouldn't the DT bindings define ports for these other pads?
In this case, probably yes for the input pad, certainly no for the
VBI/audio pads. See the other mail.
> I haven't seen this documented anywhere, but shouldn't there
> be a 1:1 correspondence between DT ports and media pads?
Not in general. But imagine a dual HDMI->CSI2 converter, for example. We
don't support this yet, but that might reasonably be described in the
device tree as a single device with two output ports. But the internal
representation would be two completely separate v4l2 subdevices.
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists