[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170405123632.GB3824@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 14:36:32 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: bsegall@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ptrace: fix PTRACE_LISTEN race corrupting task->state
On 04/04, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 14:47:34 -0700 bsegall@...gle.com wrote:
>
> > In PT_SEIZED + LISTEN mode STOP/CONT signals cause a wakeup against
> > __TASK_TRACED. If this races with the ptrace_unfreeze_traced at the end
> > of a PTRACE_LISTEN, this can wake the task /after/ the check against
> > __TASK_TRACED, but before the reset of state to TASK_TRACED. This causes
> > it to instead clobber TASK_WAKING, allowing a subsequent wakeup against
> > TRACED while the task is still on the rq wake_list, corrupting it.
>
> The changelog doesn't convey the urgency of the fix. To understand
> this we'll need to know the user-visible impact of the bug and the
> likelihood of someone hitting it.
The kernel can crash or this can lead to other hard-to-debug problems.
In short, "task->state = TASK_TRACED" in ptrace_unfreeze_traced() assumes
that nobody else can wake it up, but PTRACE_LISTEN breaks the contract.
Obviusly it is veru wrong to manipulate task->state if this task is already
running, or WAKING, or it sleeps again.
> Also your suggestion regarding which kernel version(s) should be fixed
> (and the reasoning) is always valuable.
This fixes 9899d11f "ptrace: ensure arch_ptrace/ptrace_request can never
race with SIGKILL"
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists