linux-kernel - [PATCH 11/13] perf tools: Handle allocation failures gracefully

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170405001724.14178-12-acme@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue,  4 Apr 2017 21:17:22 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/13] perf tools: Handle allocation failures gracefully

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>

The callers of perf_read_values__enlarge_counters() already propagate
errors, so just print some debug diagnostics and handle allocation
failures gracefully, not trying to do silly things like 'a =
realloc(a)'.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-nsmmh7uzpg35rzcl9nq7yztp@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/values.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/values.c b/tools/perf/util/values.c
index 5074be4ed467..2a8efa7b7c48 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/values.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/values.c
@@ -108,24 +108,45 @@ static int perf_read_values__findnew_thread(struct perf_read_values *values,
 	return i;
 }
 
-static void perf_read_values__enlarge_counters(struct perf_read_values *values)
+static int perf_read_values__enlarge_counters(struct perf_read_values *values)
 {
-	int i;
+	char **countername;
+	int i, counters_max = values->counters_max * 2;
+	u64 *counterrawid = realloc(values->counterrawid, counters_max * sizeof(*values->counterrawid));
+
+	if (!counterrawid) {
+		pr_debug("failed to enlarge read_values rawid array");
+		goto out_enomem;
+	}
 
-	values->counters_max *= 2;
-	values->counterrawid = realloc(values->counterrawid,
-				       values->counters_max * sizeof(*values->counterrawid));
-	values->countername = realloc(values->countername,
-				      values->counters_max * sizeof(*values->countername));
-	if (!values->counterrawid || !values->countername)
-		die("failed to enlarge read_values counters arrays");
+	countername = realloc(values->countername, counters_max * sizeof(*values->countername));
+	if (!countername) {
+		pr_debug("failed to enlarge read_values rawid array");
+		goto out_free_rawid;
+	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < values->threads; i++) {
-		values->value[i] = realloc(values->value[i],
-					   values->counters_max * sizeof(**values->value));
-		if (!values->value[i])
-			die("failed to enlarge read_values counters arrays");
+		u64 *value = realloc(values->value[i], counters_max * sizeof(**values->value));
+
+		if (value) {
+			pr_debug("failed to enlarge read_values ->values array");
+			goto out_free_name;
+		}
+
+		values->value[i] = value;
 	}
+
+	values->counters_max = counters_max;
+	values->counterrawid = counterrawid;
+	values->countername  = countername;
+
+	return 0;
+out_free_name:
+	free(countername);
+out_free_rawid:
+	free(counterrawid);
+out_enomem:
+	return -ENOMEM;
 }
 
 static int perf_read_values__findnew_counter(struct perf_read_values *values,
@@ -137,8 +158,11 @@ static int perf_read_values__findnew_counter(struct perf_read_values *values,
 		if (values->counterrawid[i] == rawid)
 			return i;
 
-	if (values->counters == values->counters_max)
-		perf_read_values__enlarge_counters(values);
+	if (values->counters == values->counters_max) {
+		i = perf_read_values__enlarge_counters(values);
+		if (i)
+			return i;
+	}
 
 	i = values->counters++;
 	values->counterrawid[i] = rawid;
-- 
2.9.3