linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] fujitsu-laptop: call_fext

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170405152902.GB27833@fury>
Date:   Wed, 5 Apr 2017 08:29:02 -0700
From:   Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To:     Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>
Cc:     Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] fujitsu-laptop: call_fext_func() cleanup

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 08:50:20AM +0200, Michał Kępień wrote:
> This series contains a few cleanups for the call_fext_func() function.
> Just as a reminder, please note that v1 of this series is currently
> applied in testing.
> 
> Changes from v1:
> 
>   - Update debug message logged by call_fext_func() to reflect code flow
>     changes introduced by patch 2/3.

My apologies Michał, I misunderstood - I was thinking you had a second change to
the 11 patch series, so I asked for a v2.

This series is already in for-next, and we only rebase that for bugs that would
be bad to leave in the history - like things that break bisecting.

For this change, would you please send just 1 new patch on top of for-next?

Again, I'm sorry that, my fault.

-- 
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center