[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170406003349-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 00:38:18 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
rjones@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Random guest crashes since 5c34d002dcc7 ("virtio_pci: use shared
interrupts for virtqueues")
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 08:29:34AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 06:24:50AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 06:51 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > > Any issues at all left with this tree?
> > > In particular any regressions?
> >
> > Nothing blatantly obvious in a testdrive that lasted a couple minutes.
> > I'd have to beat on it a bit to look for things beyond the reported,
> > but can't afford to do that right now.
>
> Can you check where the issues appear? I'd like to do a pure revert
> of the shared interrupts, but that three has a lot more in it..
What I did is a revert the refactorings while keeping the affinity API -
we can safely postpone them until the next release without loss of
functionality. But that's on top of my testing tree so it has unrelated
stuff as well. I'm rather confident they aren't fixing the issues but
I'll prepare a bugfix-only tree now for testing.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists