linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: qcom: smsm: Handle probe deferral

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170405034718.GJ70446@Bjorns-MacBook-Pro-2.local>
Date:   Tue, 4 Apr 2017 20:47:18 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Jonathan Neusch?fer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: qcom: smsm: Handle probe deferral

On Mon 03 Apr 19:38 PDT 2017, Jonathan Neusch?fer wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:18:29PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
[..]
> > However, for us to reach this point in smsm_probe() the above
> > qcom_smem_get() must have returned successfully, i.e. we have SMEM in
> > place so there's no need to handle this case specifically.
> 
> I came to the same conclusion but wasn't sure. I'll drop this part from
> my patch.
> 
> I'll send a v2 of this series, although after applying your suggestions,
> I can't claim much originality anymore.
> 

Don't worry about it. Looking forward to version 2.

Regards,
Bjorn