[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170406083625.418438395@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 10:38:19 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Xiong Zhou <xzhou@...hat.com>,
Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.10 27/81] xfs: use iomap new flag for newly allocated delalloc blocks
4.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
commit f65e6fad293b3a5793b7fa2044800506490e7a2e upstream.
Commit fa7f138 ("xfs: clear delalloc and cache on buffered write
failure") fixed one regression in the iomap error handling code and
exposed another. The fundamental problem is that if a buffered write
is a rewrite of preexisting delalloc blocks and the write fails, the
failure handling code can punch out preexisting blocks with valid
file data.
This was reproduced directly by sub-block writes in the LTP
kernel/syscalls/write/write03 test. A first 100 byte write allocates
a single block in a file. A subsequent 100 byte write fails and
punches out the block, including the data successfully written by
the previous write.
To address this problem, update the ->iomap_begin() handler to
distinguish newly allocated delalloc blocks from preexisting
delalloc blocks via the IOMAP_F_NEW flag. Use this flag in the
->iomap_end() handler to decide when a failed or short write should
punch out delalloc blocks.
This introduces the subtle requirement that ->iomap_begin() should
never combine newly allocated delalloc blocks with existing blocks
in the resulting iomap descriptor. This can occur when a new
delalloc reservation merges with a neighboring extent that is part
of the current write, for example. Therefore, drop the
post-allocation extent lookup from xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc() and
just return the record inserted into the fork. This ensures only new
blocks are returned and thus that preexisting delalloc blocks are
always handled as "found" blocks and not punched out on a failed
rewrite.
Reported-by: Xiong Zhou <xzhou@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
@@ -4160,6 +4160,19 @@ xfs_bmapi_read(
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * Add a delayed allocation extent to an inode. Blocks are reserved from the
+ * global pool and the extent inserted into the inode in-core extent tree.
+ *
+ * On entry, got refers to the first extent beyond the offset of the extent to
+ * allocate or eof is specified if no such extent exists. On return, got refers
+ * to the extent record that was inserted to the inode fork.
+ *
+ * Note that the allocated extent may have been merged with contiguous extents
+ * during insertion into the inode fork. Thus, got does not reflect the current
+ * state of the inode fork on return. If necessary, the caller can use lastx to
+ * look up the updated record in the inode fork.
+ */
int
xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc(
struct xfs_inode *ip,
@@ -4246,13 +4259,8 @@ xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc(
got->br_startblock = nullstartblock(indlen);
got->br_blockcount = alen;
got->br_state = XFS_EXT_NORM;
- xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay(ip, whichfork, lastx, got);
- /*
- * Update our extent pointer, given that xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay
- * might have merged it into one of the neighbouring ones.
- */
- xfs_bmbt_get_all(xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, *lastx), got);
+ xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay(ip, whichfork, lastx, got);
/*
* Tag the inode if blocks were preallocated. Note that COW fork
@@ -4264,10 +4272,6 @@ xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc(
if (whichfork == XFS_COW_FORK && (prealloc || aoff < off || alen > len))
xfs_inode_set_cowblocks_tag(ip);
- ASSERT(got->br_startoff <= aoff);
- ASSERT(got->br_startoff + got->br_blockcount >= aoff + alen);
- ASSERT(isnullstartblock(got->br_startblock));
- ASSERT(got->br_state == XFS_EXT_NORM);
return 0;
out_unreserve_blocks:
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
@@ -637,6 +637,11 @@ retry:
goto out_unlock;
}
+ /*
+ * Flag newly allocated delalloc blocks with IOMAP_F_NEW so we punch
+ * them out if the write happens to fail.
+ */
+ iomap->flags = IOMAP_F_NEW;
trace_xfs_iomap_alloc(ip, offset, count, 0, &got);
done:
if (isnullstartblock(got.br_startblock))
@@ -1085,7 +1090,8 @@ xfs_file_iomap_end_delalloc(
struct xfs_inode *ip,
loff_t offset,
loff_t length,
- ssize_t written)
+ ssize_t written,
+ struct iomap *iomap)
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
xfs_fileoff_t start_fsb;
@@ -1104,14 +1110,14 @@ xfs_file_iomap_end_delalloc(
end_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, offset + length);
/*
- * Trim back delalloc blocks if we didn't manage to write the whole
- * range reserved.
+ * Trim delalloc blocks if they were allocated by this write and we
+ * didn't manage to write the whole range.
*
* We don't need to care about racing delalloc as we hold i_mutex
* across the reserve/allocate/unreserve calls. If there are delalloc
* blocks in the range, they are ours.
*/
- if (start_fsb < end_fsb) {
+ if ((iomap->flags & IOMAP_F_NEW) && start_fsb < end_fsb) {
truncate_pagecache_range(VFS_I(ip), XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, start_fsb),
XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, end_fsb) - 1);
@@ -1141,7 +1147,7 @@ xfs_file_iomap_end(
{
if ((flags & IOMAP_WRITE) && iomap->type == IOMAP_DELALLOC)
return xfs_file_iomap_end_delalloc(XFS_I(inode), offset,
- length, written);
+ length, written, iomap);
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists