| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <fb989f4e-acf2-67ce-824b-e11726096225@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:03:21 +0800
From: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>, <marc.zyngier@....com>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <will.deacon@....com>,
<james.morse@....com>, <fu.wei@...aro.org>,
<hanjun.guo@...aro.org>, <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<gengdongjiu@...wei.com>, <zhengqiang10@...wei.com>,
<wuquanming@...wei.com>, <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>,
Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] trace: ras: add ARM processor error information
trace event
Hi Steve,
Sorry for reply late.
On 2017/3/31 0:02, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:31:01 +0800
> Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> Add a new trace event for ARM processor error information, so that
>> the user will know what error occurred. With this information the
>> user may take appropriate action.
>>
>> These trace events are consistent with the ARM processor error
>> information table which defined in UEFI 2.6 spec section N.2.4.4.1.
>>
>> ---
>> v2: add trace enabled condition as Steven's suggestion.
>> fix a typo.
>> ---
>>
>> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>> Cc: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 10 ++++++
>> include/linux/cper.h | 5 +++
>> include/ras/ras_event.h | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> index 81eabc6..6be0333 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> @@ -518,9 +518,19 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>> else if (!uuid_le_cmp(sec_type, CPER_SEC_PROC_ARM) &&
>> trace_arm_event_enabled()) {
>> struct cper_sec_proc_arm *arm_err;
>> + struct cper_arm_err_info *err_info;
>> + int i;
>>
>> arm_err = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
>> trace_arm_event(arm_err);
>> +
>> + if (trace_arm_proc_err_enabled()) {
>> + err_info = (struct cper_arm_err_info *)(arm_err + 1);
>> + for (i = 0; i < arm_err->err_info_num; i++) {
>> + trace_arm_proc_err(err_info);
>> + err_info += 1;
>> + }
>> + }
>> } else if (trace_unknown_sec_event_enabled()) {
>> void *unknown_err = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
>> trace_unknown_sec_event(&sec_type,
>> diff --git a/include/linux/cper.h b/include/linux/cper.h
>> index 85450f3..0cae900 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/cper.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/cper.h
>> @@ -270,6 +270,11 @@ enum {
>> #define CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_VIRT_ADDR 0x0008
>> #define CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_PHYSICAL_ADDR 0x0010
>>
>> +#define CPER_ARM_INFO_TYPE_CACHE 0
>> +#define CPER_ARM_INFO_TYPE_TLB 1
>> +#define CPER_ARM_INFO_TYPE_BUS 2
>> +#define CPER_ARM_INFO_TYPE_UARCH 3
>> +
>> #define CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_FIRST 0x0001
>> #define CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_LAST 0x0002
>> #define CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_PROPAGATED 0x0004
>> diff --git a/include/ras/ras_event.h b/include/ras/ras_event.h
>> index 13befad..026b094 100644
>> --- a/include/ras/ras_event.h
>> +++ b/include/ras/ras_event.h
>> @@ -206,6 +206,93 @@
>> __entry->running_state, __entry->psci_state)
>> );
>>
>> +#define ARM_PROC_ERR_TYPE \
>> + EM ( CPER_ARM_INFO_TYPE_CACHE, "cache error" ) \
>> + EM ( CPER_ARM_INFO_TYPE_TLB, "TLB error" ) \
>> + EM ( CPER_ARM_INFO_TYPE_BUS, "bus error" ) \
>> + EMe ( CPER_ARM_INFO_TYPE_UARCH, "micro-architectural error" )
>> +
>> +#define ARM_PROC_ERR_FLAGS \
>> + EM ( CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_FIRST, "First error captured" ) \
>> + EM ( CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_LAST, "Last error captured" ) \
>> + EM ( CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_PROPAGATED, "Propagated" ) \
>> + EMe ( CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_OVERFLOW, "Overflow" )
>> +
>
> Can flags have more than one bit set?
Yes, indeed. ARM_PROC_ERR_FLAGS might have more than on bit set.
Could we use __print_flags instead? like:
#define show_proc_err_flags(flags) __print_flags(flags, "|", \
{ CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_FIRST, "First error captured" }, \
{ CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_LAST, "Last error captured" }, \
{ CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_PROPAGATED, "Propagated" }, \
{ CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_OVERFLOW, "Overflow" }}
>
>> +/*
>> + * First define the enums in MM_ACTION_RESULT to be exported to userspace
>> + * via TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM().
>> + */
>> +#undef EM
>> +#undef EMe
>> +#define EM(a, b) TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(a);
>> +#define EMe(a, b) TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(a);
>> +
>> +ARM_PROC_ERR_TYPE
>> +ARM_PROC_ERR_FLAGS
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Now redefine the EM() and EMe() macros to map the enums to the strings
>> + * that will be printed in the output.
>> + */
>> +#undef EM
>> +#undef EMe
>> +#define EM(a, b) { a, b },
>> +#define EMe(a, b) { a, b }
>> +
>> +TRACE_EVENT(arm_proc_err,
>> +
>> + TP_PROTO(const struct cper_arm_err_info *err),
>> +
>> + TP_ARGS(err),
>> +
>> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> + __field(u8, type)
>> + __field(u16, multiple_error)
>> + __field(u8, flags)
>> + __field(u64, error_info)
>> + __field(u64, virt_fault_addr)
>> + __field(u64, physical_fault_addr)
>> + ),
>> +
>> + TP_fast_assign(
>> + __entry->type = err->type;
>> +
>> + if (err->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_MULTI_ERR)
>> + __entry->multiple_error = err->multiple_error;
>> + else
>> + __entry->multiple_error = ~0;
>> +
>> + if (err->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_FLAGS)
>> + __entry->flags = err->flags;
>> + else
>> + __entry->flags = ~0;
>> +
>> + if (err->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_ERR_INFO)
>> + __entry->error_info = err->error_info;
>> + else
>> + __entry->error_info = 0ULL;
>> +
>> + if (err->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_VIRT_ADDR)
>> + __entry->virt_fault_addr = err->virt_fault_addr;
>> + else
>> + __entry->virt_fault_addr = 0ULL;
>> +
>> + if (err->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_PHYSICAL_ADDR)
>> + __entry->physical_fault_addr = err->physical_fault_addr;
>> + else
>> + __entry->physical_fault_addr = 0ULL;
>
> else statements add a lot of branch conditions, and kills the branch
> prediction. What about setting up default values, and then setting only
> if the if statement is true.
>
>
> memset(&__entry->error_info, 0,
> sizeof(__entry) - offsetof(typeof(__entry), error_info)));
> __entry->multiple_error = ~0;
> __entry->flags = ~0;
>
> if (...)
I'll use this style next version, thanks.
>
>> + ),
>> +
>> + TP_printk("ARM Processor Error: type %s; count: %u; flags: %s;"
>> + " error info: %016llx; virtual address: %016llx;"
>> + " physical address: %016llx",
>> + __print_symbolic(__entry->type, ARCH_PROC_ERR_TYPE),
>> + __entry->multiple_error,
>> + __print_symbolic(__entry->flags, ARCH_PROC_ERR_FLAGS),
>
> Again, can flags have more than one bit set? If so, then this wont work.
>
> -- Steve
>
>> + __entry->error_info, __entry->virt_fault_addr,
>> + __entry->physical_fault_addr)
>> +);
>> +
>> /*
>> * Unknown Section Report
>> *
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> .
>
--
Thanks,
Xie XiuQi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists