[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170406083604.474899074@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 10:38:24 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@...rix.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 02/26] xen/setup: Dont relocate p2m over existing one
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@...rix.com>
commit 7ecec8503af37de6be4f96b53828d640a968705f upstream.
When relocating the p2m, take special care not to relocate it so
that is overlaps with the current location of the p2m/initrd. This is
needed since the full extent of the current location is not marked as a
reserved region in the e820.
This was seen to happen to a dom0 with a large initial p2m and a small
reserved region in the middle of the initial p2m.
Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@...rix.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/xen/setup.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
@@ -713,10 +713,9 @@ static void __init xen_reserve_xen_mfnli
size = PFN_PHYS(xen_start_info->nr_p2m_frames);
}
- if (!xen_is_e820_reserved(start, size)) {
- memblock_reserve(start, size);
+ memblock_reserve(start, size);
+ if (!xen_is_e820_reserved(start, size))
return;
- }
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
/*
@@ -727,6 +726,7 @@ static void __init xen_reserve_xen_mfnli
BUG();
#else
xen_relocate_p2m();
+ memblock_free(start, size);
#endif
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists