[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170406094626.a42cq66ezgq4lohh@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 11:46:33 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kernel: sched: Provide a pointer to the valid CPU
mask
On 2017-04-06 11:32:24 [+0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 08:42:02PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > While converting the existing users I tried to stick with the rules
> > above however… well mostly CPUFREQ tries to temporary switch the CPU
> > mask to do something on a certain CPU and then switches the mask back it
> > its original value.
>
>
> There's a bunch of that through ancient and rotten parts of the kernel.
> All those sites are broken.
>
> Nothing stops userspace from setting a different affinity right after
> the kernel does for those threads.
Good. So you are saying I should convert them to something like
queue_work_on()?
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists