lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170406133420.3e231d2a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2017 13:34:20 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Derek Robson <robsonde@...il.com>, Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got conflicts in:

  drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_sasem.c
  drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_sir.c

between commits:

  e66267161971 ("[media] rc: promote lirc_sir out of staging")
  51bb3fd788cb ("[media] staging: lirc_sasem: remove")

from the v4l-dvb tree and commit:

  87ddb91067b9 ("Staging: media: lirc - style fix")

from the staging tree.

I fixed it up (I removed both files - the updates to lirc_sir.c were
also done in the v4l-dvb tree) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ