linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] stack tracing causes: kernel/module.c:271 module_assert_mutex_or

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170406040702.GW1600@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Apr 2017 21:07:02 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] stack tracing causes: kernel/module.c:271
 module_assert_mutex_or_preempt

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 09:31:45PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 13:42:29 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > > OK, do you want me to send you a patch, or should I take your patch
> > > into my tree and add this?  
> > 
> > Given that I don't seem to have disable_stack_tracer() and
> > enable_stack_tracer(), could you please add them in?
> 
> That's what I meant about "send you a patch" :-)

Reading/comprehension-challenged today, aren't I?

This doesn't conflict with anything in my tree, so either your tree
or my tree is fine by me.  The advantage of your tree is that you
could easily sync it up with the other changes needed.

							Thanx, Paul