[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1491488362-27198-1-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 16:19:22 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mpx: Correctly report do_mpx_bt_fault() failures to user-space
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
When this function fails it just sends a SIGSEGV signal to
user-space using force_sig(). This signal is missing
essential information about the cause, e.g. the trap_nr or
an error code.
Fix this by propagating the error to the only caller of
mpx_handle_bd_fault(), do_bounds(), which sends the correct
SIGSEGV signal to the process.
Fixes: fe3d197f84319 ('x86, mpx: On-demand kernel allocation of bounds tables')
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
---
arch/x86/mm/mpx.c | 10 +---------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
index cd44ae7..1c34b76 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
@@ -526,15 +526,7 @@ int mpx_handle_bd_fault(void)
if (!kernel_managing_mpx_tables(current->mm))
return -EINVAL;
- if (do_mpx_bt_fault()) {
- force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
- /*
- * The force_sig() is essentially "handling" this
- * exception, so we do not pass up the error
- * from do_mpx_bt_fault().
- */
- }
- return 0;
+ return do_mpx_bt_fault();
}
/*
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists