linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tick/nohz: Fix wrong user and system time accouting against vtime sampling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 06 Apr 2017 10:36:01 -0400
From:   Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:     Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tick/nohz: Fix wrong user and system time accouting
 against vtime sampling

On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 23:36 -0700, Wanpeng Li wrote:

> This patch offsets the tick to avert all ticks alignment in order 
> that the vtime sampling does not end up "in phase" with the jiffies 
> incrementing.
> 
> Reported-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
> Suggested-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>

Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>

> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -1197,8 +1197,12 @@ void tick_setup_sched_timer(void)
>  	/* Get the next period (per-CPU) */
>  	hrtimer_set_expires(&ts->sched_timer,
> tick_init_jiffy_update());
>  
> -	/* Offset the tick to avert jiffies_lock contention. */
> -	if (sched_skew_tick) {
> +	/*
> +	 * Offset the tick to avert jiffies_lock contention, and all
> ticks
> +	 * alignment in order that the vtime sampling does not end
> up "in
> +	 * phase" with the jiffies incrementing.
> +	 */

I feel like part of the explanation is missing from this
comment, but I am not sure how to make it better without
making it way too long :)

> +	if (sched_skew_tick || tick_nohz_full_enabled()) {
>  		u64 offset = ktime_to_ns(tick_period) >> 1;
>  		do_div(offset, num_possible_cpus());
>  		offset *= smp_processor_id();