[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1491488461-24621-3-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 19:50:59 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: <thierry.reding@...il.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<jonathanh@...dia.com>
CC: <mark.rutland@....com>, <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 2/4] pwm: tegra: Increase precision in pwm rate calculation
The rate of the PWM calculated as follows:
hz = NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns;
rate = (rate + (hz / 2)) / hz;
This has the precision loss in lower PWM rate.
Changing this to have more precision as:
hz = DIV_ROUND_CLOSE(NSEC_PER_SEC * 100, period_ns);
rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSE(rate * 100, hz)
Example:
1. period_ns = 16672000, PWM clock rate is 200KHz.
Based on old formula
hz = NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns
= 1000000000ul/16672000
= 59 (59.98)
rate = (200K + 59/2)/59 = 3390
Based on new method:
hz = 5998
rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSE(200000*100, 5998) = 3334
If we measure the PWM signal rate, we will get more accurate period
with rate value of 3334 instead of 3390.
2. period_ns = 16803898, PWM clock rate is 200KHz.
Based on old formula:
hz = 60, rate = 3333
Based on new formula:
hz = 5951, rate = 3360
The rate of 3360 is more near to requested period then the 3333.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
---
Changes from V1:
- None
drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c
index 0a688da..e9c4de5 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c
@@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ static int tegra_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
struct tegra_pwm_chip *pc = to_tegra_pwm_chip(chip);
unsigned long long c = duty_ns;
unsigned long rate, hz;
+ unsigned long long ns100 = NSEC_PER_SEC;
+ unsigned long precision = 100; /* Consider 2 digit precision */
u32 val = 0;
int err;
@@ -94,9 +96,11 @@ static int tegra_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
* cycles at the PWM clock rate will take period_ns nanoseconds.
*/
rate = clk_get_rate(pc->clk) >> PWM_DUTY_WIDTH;
- hz = NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns;
- rate = (rate + (hz / 2)) / hz;
+ /* Consider precision in PWM_SCALE_WIDTH rate calculation */
+ ns100 *= precision;
+ hz = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(ns100, period_ns);
+ rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate * precision, hz);
/*
* Since the actual PWM divider is the register's frequency divider
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists