[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94155867-d589-6451-2f3b-a960df559702@google.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:30:40 -0700
From: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>
To: zhangshuxiaomi@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: arve@...roid.com, riandrews@...roid.com,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhangshuxiao <zhangshuxiao@...omi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ashmem: lseek failed due to no
FMODE_LSEEK.
On 04/06/2017 07:30 AM, zhangshuxiaomi@...il.com wrote:
> From: zhangshuxiao <zhangshuxiao@...omi.com>
>
> vfs_llseek will check whether the file mode has
> FMODE_LSEEK, no return failure. But ashmem can be
> lseek, so add FMODE_LSEEK to ashmem file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shuxiao Zhang <zhangshuxiao@...omi.com>
> Tested-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c b/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c
> index 3f11332..e4530ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c
> @@ -392,6 +392,7 @@ static int ashmem_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> ret = PTR_ERR(vmfile);
> goto out;
> }
> + vmfile->f_mode |= FMODE_LSEEK;
> asma->file = vmfile;
> }
> get_file(asma->file);
>
This commit message is missing some important context.
ashmem_llseek() passes the llseek() call through to the backing shmem
file. 91360b02ab48 ("ashmem: use vfs_llseek()") changed this from
directly calling the file's llseek() op into a VFS layer call. This
also adds a check for the FMODE_LSEEK bit, so without that bit
ashmem_llseek() now always fails with -ESPIPE.
I've tested that this patch fixes the regression on both hikey running
AOSP and User Mode Linux running Debian.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists