| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <70df49dd-7acb-a507-ba5d-55fa426a6840@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 07:44:07 +0300
From: Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Nair, Jayachandran" <Jayachandran.Nair@...ium.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/3] printk: fix double printing with earlycon
On 04/06/2017 12:57 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Aleksey Makarov
> <aleksey.makarov@...aro.org> wrote:
>> If a console was specified by ACPI SPCR table _and_ command line
>> parameters like "console=ttyAMA0" _and_ "earlycon" were specified,
>> then log messages appear twice.
>>
>> The root cause is that the code traverses the list of specified
>> consoles (the `console_cmdline` array) and stops at the first match.
>> But it may happen that the same console is referred by the elements
>> of this array twice:
>>
>> pl011,mmio,0x87e024000000,115200 -- from SPCR
>> ttyAMA0 -- from command line
>>
>> but in this case `preferred_console` points to the second entry and
>> the flag CON_CONSDEV is not set, so bootconsole is not deregistered.
>>
>> To fix that, introduce an invariant "The last non-braille console
>> is always the preferred one" on the entries of the console_cmdline
>> array. Then traverse it in reverse order to be sure that if
>> the console is preferred then it will be the first matching entry.
>> Introduce variable console_cmdline_cnt that keeps the number
>> of elements of the console_cmdline array (Petr Mladek). It helps
>> to get rid of the loop that searches for the end of this array.
>
>> #define MAX_CMDLINECONSOLES 8
>>
>> static struct console_cmdline console_cmdline[MAX_CMDLINECONSOLES];
>> +static int console_cmdline_cnt;
>
> This should be equal to -1 at the beginning, am I right?
No, this is not an index of the last element, this is count of
elements of cmdline_console array. So it is 0 initially.
>> static int preferred_console = -1;
>> int console_set_on_cmdline;
>> @@ -1905,12 +1906,26 @@ static int __add_preferred_console(char *name, int idx, char *options,
>> * See if this tty is not yet registered, and
>> * if we have a slot free.
>> */
>> - for (i = 0, c = console_cmdline;
>> - i < MAX_CMDLINECONSOLES && c->name[0];
>> - i++, c++) {
>> + for (i = 0, c = console_cmdline; i < console_cmdline_cnt; i++, c++) {
>> if (strcmp(c->name, name) == 0 && c->index == idx) {
>> - if (!brl_options)
>> - preferred_console = i;
>> +
>
>> + if (brl_options)
>> + return 0;
>
> Is it invariant or brl_options may appear while looping?
I am not sure I understand your question.
If we find that we are registering a braille console that
has already been registered, we just return without updating
preferred console (it is only about regular consoles) and
without swapping it with the last element of the array (because it
is explicitly mentioned in the invariant: The last
*non-braille* console is always the preferred one)
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Maintain an invariant that will help to find if
>> + * the matching console is preferred, see
>> + * register_console():
>> + *
>> + * The last non-braille console is always
>> + * the preferred one.
>> + */
>> + if (i != console_cmdline_cnt - 1)
>> + swap(console_cmdline[i],
>> + console_cmdline[console_cmdline_cnt - 1]);
>
> i'm wondering if you can iterate from the end to beginning as you do below.
> It would simplify things.
You mean iterate to find the last element?
Yes I can and it is how this was implemented in v8,
Petr Mladek asked to introduce console_cmdline_cnt.
Thank you for review
Aleksey Makarov
>> +
>> + preferred_console = console_cmdline_cnt - 1;
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -1923,6 +1938,7 @@ static int __add_preferred_console(char *name, int idx, char *options,
>> braille_set_options(c, brl_options);
>>
>> c->index = idx;
>> + console_cmdline_cnt++;
>> return 0;
>> }
>> /*
>> @@ -2457,12 +2473,24 @@ void register_console(struct console *newcon)
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> - * See if this console matches one we selected on
>> - * the command line.
>> + * See if this console matches one we selected on the command line.
>> + *
>> + * There may be several entries in the console_cmdline array matching
>> + * with the same console, one with newcon->match(), another by
>> + * name/index:
>> + *
>> + * pl011,mmio,0x87e024000000,115200 -- added from SPCR
>> + * ttyAMA0 -- added from command line
>> + *
>> + * Traverse the console_cmdline array in reverse order to be
>> + * sure that if this console is preferred then it will be the first
>> + * matching entry. We use the invariant that is maintained in
>> + * __add_preferred_console().
>> */
>> - for (i = 0, c = console_cmdline;
>> - i < MAX_CMDLINECONSOLES && c->name[0];
>> - i++, c++) {
>
>> + for (i = console_cmdline_cnt - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
>
>
>
>> +
>> + c = console_cmdline + i;
>> +
>> if (!newcon->match ||
>> newcon->match(newcon, c->name, c->index, c->options) != 0) {
>> /* default matching */
>> --
>> 2.12.1
>>
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists