lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2017 19:48:50 +0300
From:   Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <tony@...mide.com>, <nsekhar@...com>,
        <jsarha@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: davinci_mdio: add GPIO reset logic


On 06/04/17 15:05, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> Do you really need more than one GPIO? A single gpio would make all
>>> this code a lot simpler.
>>>
>>
>> Yes we need. Some of our boards have separate GPIO RESET lines for
>> different PHYs on the same MDIO bus.
> 
> If you have a one-to-one mapping of GPIO and PHY, you should really be
> modelling that differently. You want to be able to reset just a single
> PHY, i.e. make it part of the PHY driver, or maybe the PHY core.
> 
>      Andrew
> 


I'm not sure how it would be modelled. We have never had the need to reset
just one PHY on the MDIO bus.
Some boards have a single RESET line to multiple PHYs whereas others have individual
RESET lines. In all cases we just want to do the RESET once per boot.

cheers,
-roger

Powered by blists - more mailing lists