[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170406170212.GA7030@fury>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 10:02:12 -0700
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, juri.lelli@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, xlpang@...hat.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
jdesfossez@...icios.com, bristot@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v6 04/13] futex,rt_mutex: Provide futex specific
rt_mutex API
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 02:15:05PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:37:02PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> >
> > But, Peter are you testing this with anything in particular?
>
> Testing? :-)
>
> I ran some of the futex pi tests we have, and have a slightly modified
> kernel+version of pi_stress to trigger more funnies.
>
> Other than that Sebastian ran various versions through -rt and their
> customer workloads (and found bugs).
>
OK, that's more or less what I assumed, but wanted to confirm. I'm bubbling up
the futex torture test suite on my priority list (now that I find myself with a
lot more time available for this stuff) \o/
--
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists