[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcHh8HOvocHsTuHmNRAt5J5WdOUAuWDiup+Ubz=-WQ0bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 20:30:20 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: core: Decouple open drain/source flag with
active low/high
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 06 April 2017 09:40 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Adding different flag for the Open Drain/Open Source which is valid
>>> only when Single ended flag is enabled.
>>> if (single_ended) {
>>> - if (active_low)
>>> + if (open_drain)
>>
>> This breaks ACPI case, right?
> In acpi case, single_ended is not handled. It only handles the active LOW.
>
> From code:
Fair enough.
I would look into ACPI spec for possibility to add this kind of functionality.
Thanks.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists