lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2017 21:21:47 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, tj@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch V2 2/2] x86/mm/numa: remove the
 numa_nodemask_from_meminfo()

On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:01:13PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 06:42:16PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > Config is attached.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > Looks like fake numa is the key.
> 
> ...
> 
> > NUMA: Warning: node ids are out of bound, from=0 to=1 distance=20                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               [    0.000000] numa_register_memblks: numa_nodes_parsed: 0
> > numa_register_memblks: nid: 0
> > numa_register_memblks: nid: 1
> > numa_register_memblks: nid: 2
> > numa_register_memblks: nid: 3
> 
> Yeah, the fake numa thing calls emu_setup_memblk() and that doesn't
> set numa_nodes_parsed to the number of fake numa nodes. And since with
> that "cleanup" which opened more work than it saved (btw, this is the
> last time I'm looking at crap like that) we got rid of the "enlarging"
> of the node mask to the actual nodes count and *that* blows up with
> numa_nodes_parsed having only node 0 in there.
> 
> Long story short, something as trivial as this helps here:

Yep. Works for me.

Reported-and-tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists