lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78773671-41f0-3c48-2ecd-64597cbf347d@wedev4u.fr>
Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2017 22:07:07 +0200
From:   Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>
To:     Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@...com>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>
Cc:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mtd: spi-nor: add stm32 qspi driver

Hi all,

Le 30/03/2017 à 12:15, Marek Vasut a écrit :
> On 03/30/2017 09:31 AM, Ludovic BARRE wrote:
>> hi Cyrille
>>
>> I see your patch series
>>
>> [PATCH v5 0/6] mtd: spi-nor: parse SFDP tables to setup (Q)SPI memories
>>
>> No problem, I rebase my V2 onto your patch
> 
> I still didn't review that, so it might take a bit until it hits
> mainline. I think the stm32 stuff looks pretty OK, so we can take that
> before the SFDP stuff, no?
> 

About the SFDP patches they are still RFC so yes, they can wait, no
problem with that. Anyway I was working on them this afternoon so they
are not finalized yet.

However the first 3 patches of the series, especially patch
"mtd: spi-nor: introduce more SPI protocols and the Dual Transfer Mode",
are needed as a base to fix other long time pending issues.

Those patches are available from both the github/spi-nor and linux-next
tree. So I think Ludovic can rebase his patches, test them then send v3
to the linux-mtd mailing list with the relevant ChangeLog in the cover
letter.

For your information:
2016-06-20 https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/638138/
2016-10-04 https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/678162/
2016-10-05 https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/678404/
2016-10-24 https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/685981/
2016-11-21 https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/697268/
2017-01-25 https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/719777/
2017-03-22 https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/742376/


Sorry but I think the patch changing the 3rd argument of spi_nor_scan()
has precedence over newer patches in the queue to be mainlined.

Best regards,

Cyrille

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ