[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaz8kASd1XQYchj2uybo3nKeeNqfbQ4RpRNFeDxgdn2uA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:40:47 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, openwrt-devel@...nwrt.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH] config: Add Fedora config fragments
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
> Based on feedback, Fedora is a popular distribution for people who like
> to build their own kernels. To make this easier, add a set of
> reasonablly common config options for Fedora.
>
> fedora-core.config contains a base set of options that should work on a
> standard fedora system. fedora-fs.config and fedora-networking.config
> contain more options for those subsystems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
I would use this, so:
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
I hacked up fragments for using Arch Linux and I believe OpenWRT
could use fragments like this as well.
I think we should discuss feature splitting of the config fragments.
What is complicated with configs is finding the right kernel features
for the userspace you are doing. At one point, I don't remember where
or when, it was discussed adding a systemd config fragment, as it
is using a slew of non-optional kernel config options. Then other
distros using that could simply use that fragment to get it right.
I'm pretty sure the systemd deps are a subset of the Fedora config
for example.
I would think similar fragments could be good for e.g. wireless
networking, USB storage and such things where I for one found
it really annoying having to spend time finding the right Kconfig to
just get that rolling reasonably.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists