[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1704071010020.1716@nanos>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:15:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
dann frazier <dann.frazier@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/18] clocksource/arch_timer: Errata workaround
infrastructure rework
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/04/2017 18:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > Are you happy to take the arch_timer patches above? If yes, Marc can
> > create a common branch with the first 5 patches which I will merge in
> > the arm64 tree. You can then pull the whole series into your tree.
>
> Hi Catalin,
>
> I'm fine with the merge process you are proposing. But before going
> forward, I would like to wait a bit in order to give the opportunity to
> Thomas to review the patchset.
I'm fine with that. It's sad that we need to have a workaround framework
for dealing with this, but silicon tinkerers seem to compete on providing
the most broken implementation of an _architected_ timer.
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists