[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170407020019.GB17231@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:00:19 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] zram: implement deduplication in zram
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 08:40:56AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Andrew and Joonsoo,
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 03:25:02PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:38:05 +0900 js1304@...il.com wrote:
> >
> > > This patchset implements deduplication feature in zram. Motivation
> > > is to save memory usage by zram. There are detailed description
> > > about motivation and experimental results on patch #2 so please
> > > refer it.
> >
> > I'm getting a lot of rejects against the current -mm tree. So this is
> > one of those patchsets which should be prepared against -mm, please.
>
> Due to my partial IO refactoring. Sorry for the inconvenience.
> It's still on-going and I want to merge it before new feature like
> dedup.
>
> Joonsoo,
>
> I will send partial-IO rework formal patch next week and start to
> review your patchset so I hope you resend your patchset based on it
> with my comments.
No problem. I will wait. :)
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists