[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170407162044.ntn4w6ukpxhi2ei2@node.shutemov.name>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 19:20:44 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: hpa@...or.com
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86/mm: Allow to have userspace mappings above
47-bits
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 09:09:27AM -0700, hpa@...or.com wrote:
> >I think the reasonable way for an application to claim it's 63-bit
> >clean
> >is to make allocations with (void *)-1 as hint address.
>
> You realize that people have said that about just about every memory
Any better solution?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists