| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 19:59:12 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
David Nellans <dnellans@...dia.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [HMM 01/16] mm/memory/hotplug: add memory type parameter to
arch_add/remove_memory
On Fri 07-04-17 13:10:59, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 06:37:37PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 07-04-17 12:10:00, Jerome Glisse wrote:
[...]
> > > No guaranteed so yes i somewhat care about max_pfn, i do not care about
> > > any of its existing user last time i check but it might matter for some
> > > new user.
> >
> > OK, then we can add add_pages() which would do __add_pages by default
> > (#ifndef ARCH_HAS_ADD_PAGES) and x86 would override it do also call
> > update_end_of_memory_vars. This sounds easier to me than updating all
> > the archs and add something that most of them do not really care about.
> >
> > But I will not insist. If you think that your approach is better I will
> > not object.
>
> Something like attached patch ?
No I meant something like the diff below but maybe even that is too
excessive.
> >
> > Btw. is your series reviewed and ready to be applied to the mm tree? I
> > planed to post mine on Monday so I would like to know how do we
> > coordinate. I rebase on topo of yours or vice versa.
>
> Well v18 core patches were review by Mel, i did include all of his comment
> in v19 (i don't think i did miss any). I think Dan still want to look at
> patch 1 and 3 for ZONE_DEVICE.
>
> But i always welcome more review. I know Anshuman replied to this patch
> to improve a comments. Balbir had issue on powerpc because iomem_resource.end
> isn't clamped to MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS But that is all review i got so far on v19.
>
> I don't mind rebasing on top of your patchset. What ever is easier for
> Andrew i guess.
Well, considering that my patchset is changing the behavior of the core
of the memory hotplug I would prefer if it could go first and add new
user on top. But I realize that you are maintaining your series for a
_long_ time so I would completely understand if you wouldn't be
impressed by another rebase...
If you are OK with rebasing and I will help you with that as much as I
can I would be really grateful.
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 69188841717a..66e74928c2f0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -2260,6 +2260,10 @@ config ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
def_bool y
depends on X86_64 || (X86_32 && HIGHMEM)
+config ARCH_HAS_ADD_PAGES
+ def_bool y
+ depends on X86_64 && ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
+
config ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
def_bool y
depends on MEMORY_HOTPLUG
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
index 754d47cb2847..ed1bb63d8f90 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -626,9 +626,9 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
* After memory hotplug the variables max_pfn, max_low_pfn and high_memory need
* updating.
*/
-static void update_end_of_memory_vars(u64 start, u64 size)
+static void update_end_of_memory_vars(u64 start_pfn, u64 nr_pages)
{
- unsigned long end_pfn = PFN_UP(start + size);
+ unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + nr_pages;
if (end_pfn > max_pfn) {
max_pfn = end_pfn;
@@ -637,22 +637,29 @@ static void update_end_of_memory_vars(u64 start, u64 size)
}
}
-int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, bool want_memblock)
+int add_pages(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
+ unsigned long nr_pages, bool want_memblock)
{
- unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
int ret;
- init_memory_mapping(start, start + size);
-
ret = __add_pages(nid, start_pfn, nr_pages, want_memblock);
WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
/* update max_pfn, max_low_pfn and high_memory */
- update_end_of_memory_vars(start, size);
+ update_end_of_memory_vars(start_pfn, nr_pages);
return ret;
}
+
+int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, bool want_memblock)
+{
+ unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ init_memory_mapping(start, start + size);
+
+ return add_pages(nid, start_pfn, nr_pages, want_memblock);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_add_memory);
#define PAGE_INUSE 0xFD
diff --git a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
index a9985f6c460a..a0973fc80e60 100644
--- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
+++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
@@ -113,6 +113,14 @@ extern int __remove_pages(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
extern int __add_pages(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
unsigned long nr_pages, bool want_memblock);
+#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ADD_PAGES
+static inline int add_pages(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
+ unsigned long nr_pages, bool want_memblock)
+{
+ return __add_pages(nid, start_pfn, nr_pages, want_memblock);
+}
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
extern int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start);
#else
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists