linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf annotate: Refactor the code to parse disassemble lines with {l,r}trim()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19132e97-e43b-7a31-c618-c048a1716477@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 8 Apr 2017 03:08:27 +0900
From:   Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf annotate: Refactor the code to parse disassemble
 lines with {l,r}trim()



On 04/08/2017 12:04 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 12:01:30PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 11:24:17PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
>>> @@ -1148,9 +1136,9 @@ static int symbol__parse_objdump_line(struct symbol *sym, struct map *map,
>>>  {
>>>  	struct annotation *notes = symbol__annotation(sym);
>>>  	struct disasm_line *dl;
>>> -	char *line = NULL, *parsed_line, *tmp, *tmp2, *c;
>>> +	char *line = NULL, *parsed_line, *tmp, *tmp2;
>>>  	size_t line_len;
>>> -	s64 line_ip, offset = -1;
>>> +	s64 line_ip = -1, offset = -1;
>>
>> Try to avoid doing these unrelated changes, i.e. moving the setting of
>> line_ip to -1 from down below to here.
>>
>> It is unrelated to what you're doing here, i.e. using ltrim/rtrim, and
>> requires looking at the code to see if this can be done, as I don't know
>> if line_ip is set to something else in-between... I am removing this,
>> leaving the patch just for rtrim/ltrim.
>
> Ok, please do it yourself, after taking into account the other comment
> on this patch, I'm looking at the other patches now.
>
> - Arnaldo
>

Thank you for detailed feedback.
I understood. As you said, I'll remove unrelated things in this patch.
And I'll send v2 based on your comment.

Thanks,
Taeung