lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 8 Apr 2017 17:07:17 +0100
From:   Alfonso Lima <alfonsolimaastor@...il.com>
To:     apw@...onical.com, joe@...ches.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [bug report] checkpatch: if statement does not need to be enclosed
 in parentheses

Hi,

In current linux-next, if you run the script on this piece of
code:

#define FOO(a)				\
	if (a) {			\
		something();		\
		something_else();	\
	}

You should get:

ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
#1: FILE: foo.c:1:
+#define FOO(a)				\
+	if (a) {			\
+		something();		\
+		something_else();	\
+	}

We could silence checkpatch.pl using "do {} while ()" around the
if statement. However, the "if () {}" statement should be
enough. If someone could confirm this, I'll go and fix it.

Thanks,
Alfonso

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ