[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1491774937.4166.198.camel@au1.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 07:55:37 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@....ibm.com>
To: Christopher Bostic <cbostic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mingo@...hat.com, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Alistair Popple <alistair@...ple.id.au>,
"Edward A . James" <eajames@...ibm.com>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 19/23] drivers/fsi: Add GPIO based FSI master
On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 07:53 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> FYI. pdbg in userspace operates without any delays in practice, the
> overhead between the various load/store instructions seems
> sufficient.
>
> The only delay that's needed is when going through the FSI2PIB (to do
> SCOMs) where it seems like back-2-back accesses can be problematic.
Note: This isn't an objection to merging the patches. We can look at
doing an improved backend later.
Cheers,
Ben.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists