[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170409035854.7swkcndswifd622w@angband.pl>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 05:58:54 +0200
From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>
To: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: scrub: use do_div() for 64-by-32 division
On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 11:07:37PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Unbreaks ARM and possibly other 32-bit architectures.
Turns out those "other 32-bit architectures" happen to include i386.
A modular build:
ERROR: "__udivdi3" [fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined!
With the patch, i386 builds fine.
> Tested on amd64 where all is fine, and on arm (Odroid-U2) where scrub
> sometimes works, but, like most operations, randomly dies with some badness
> that doesn't look related: io_schedule, kunmap_high. That badness wasn't
> there in 4.11-rc5, needs investigating, but since it's not connected to our
> issue at hand, I consider this patch sort-of tested.
Looks like current -next is pretty broken: while amd64 is ok, on an i386 box
(non-NX Pentium 4) it hangs very early during boot, way before filesystem
modules would be loaded. Qemu boots but has random hangs.
So it looks like it's compile only for now...
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Meow!
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Collisions shmolisions, let's see them find a collision or second
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ preimage for double rot13!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists