[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170410180804.GA28657@google.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:08:04 -0700
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>,
Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>,
Peter Foley <pefoley2@...oley.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: use -Oz instead of -Os when using clang
Hi Masahiro,
El Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 02:57:43AM +0900 Masahiro Yamada ha dit:
> 2017-03-31 1:41 GMT+09:00 Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>:
> > El Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:03:02AM +0900 Masahiro Yamada ha dit:
> >
> >> 2017-03-28 10:19 GMT+09:00 Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>:
> >> > This generates smaller resulting object code when compiled with clang.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> >> > ---
> >> > Makefile | 3 ++-
> >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> >> > index b2faa9319372..66bcdbf58371 100644
> >> > --- a/Makefile
> >> > +++ b/Makefile
> >> > @@ -638,7 +638,8 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fdata-sections,)
> >> > endif
> >> >
> >> > ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
> >> > -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Os $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
> >> > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Oz,-Os)
> >> > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
> >> > else
> >> > ifdef CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES
> >> > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O2 $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> This is the same as the following commit in LLVMLinux
> >> except Author/Signed-off-by.
> >>
> >> Who should the authorship really belong to?
> >
> > (this time without html, sorry for the noise)
> >
> > It should belong to Behan, I missed to add a 'From' tag, sorry about
> > that. Should I resend with the tag or can you fix it when applying the
> > patch?
>
>
> No need to re-send it. I can fixup it manually.
I couldn't locate this patch in your tree, has it been picked up?
Thanks
Matthias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists