linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170410065552.44hidp2gpakyeawg@dell>
Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2017 07:55:52 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree

On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 15:31:15 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 09:21 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >   
> > > > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >   
> > > > > After merging the mfd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > > > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> > > > > 
> > > > > /home/sfr/next/next/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c:25:31:
> > > > > fatal error: asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h: No such file or directory
> > > > > 
> > > > > Caused by commit
> > > > > 
> > > > >   eb2a445f7d8f ("mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Fix a mess with compilation
> > > > > units")
> > > > > 
> > > > > I have reverted that commit for today.  
> > > > 
> > > > Andy,
> > > > 
> > > > I'm pulling this commit.  Despite you thinking the error is unrelated
> > > > to your patch, something is clearly wrong and I don't have time to
> > > > investigate.
> > > > 
> > > > Ball is in your court.  
> > > 
> > > Okay, I've had a *very* quick looks.  
> > 
> > > Seems as if you should be depending on INTEL_PMC_IPC.  
> > 
> > As a quick fix, yes. As a proper fix the PMC/SCU mess should be fixed in
> > a way to provide a header in include/platform_data/x86.
> > 
> > I will prepare v4.
> > Thanks.
> 
> Ping?

I guess this is still causing an issue in -next?

The patch has now been removed from mfd-next and the result pushed.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog