linux-kernel - Re: iov_iter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170410195711.GD29622@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2017 20:57:11 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iov_iter_pipe warning.

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 03:42:06PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>  > Do you have a reliable reproducer?
> 
> Not reliable, but I'll see if I can find some time to narrow it down
> this week.  I've been working on better logging of "wtf just happened"
> the last few weeks, so it should get easier once I finish that work.

I would suggest
	a) slapping WARN_ON(pipe->nr_bufs); right before the loop
in splice_direct_to_actor().  Internal pipe should be empty when we
enter this function.
	b) the same WARN_ON() in the very end of the loop body.

We should have started with empty pipe.  We'd called ->splice_read()
and it had returned a positive number (in read_len).  That should be
the amount we'd pushed in there.  Then we call actor(), with
sd->total_len set to read_len.  Its return value is
	* positive (or we would've buggered off)
	* no less than read_len (ditto)
so it should have drained the pipe entirely, leaving it empty again.

Finding it not just non-empty, but full means that something's very
wrong.  The actor here is essentially ->splice_write(), and I'm really
curious which file is the target.  Actually, could you turn those
WARN_ON() into
	if (WARN_ON(pipe->nr_bufs))
		printk(KERN_ERR "->splice_write = %p",
			sd->u.file->f_op->splice_write);
and see which function it is?