[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170410202736.zy7naw74hvrdmfzk@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:27:36 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, lee.jones@...aro.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] includes: dt-bindings: Rename STM32F429 pinctrl
DT bindings
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
> STM32F4 MCU series is composed of several SOC (STM32F429, STM32F469, ...).
> Most of muxing definition are identical. So to avoid to duplicate bindings
> definition, this patch create common definitions.
This is a lot of churn. Some confirmation that the resultant dtb is the
same before and after would be nice. Perhaps the script you used to
convert this as well.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists