linux-kernel - Re: Random guest crashes since 5c34d002dcc7 ("virtio_pci: use shared interrupts for virtqueues")

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:23:01 +0300
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
        virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        rjones@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Random guest crashes since 5c34d002dcc7 ("virtio_pci: use shared
 interrupts for virtqueues")

On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 07:01:34AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 21:56 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> 
> > OK. test3 and test4 are now pushed: test3 should fix your hang,
> > test4 is trying to fix a crash reported independently.
> 
> test3 does not fix the post hibernate hang business that I can easily
> reproduce, those are NFS, and at least as old as 4.4.  Host/guest,
> dunno, put 4.4 on both, guest hangs intermittently.

OK so IIUC you agree it's a good idea to send test4 to Linus, right?
Hybernation's still broken but that's not a regression.

> [<ffffffffa039a550>] __rpc_wait_for_completion_task+0x30/0x30 [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffffa039a56e>] rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x1e/0xb0 [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffffa039a550>] __rpc_wait_for_completion_task+0x30/0x30 [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffff810c6450>] autoremove_wake_function+0x50/0x50
> [<ffffffffa038f670>] call_decode+0x850/0x850 [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffffa038f670>] call_decode+0x850/0x850 [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffffa039b17e>] __rpc_execute+0x14e/0x440 [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffff810f7d35>] ktime_get+0x35/0xa0
> [<ffffffffa0390900>] rpc_run_task+0x120/0x170 [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffffa064a1c6>] nfs4_call_sync_sequence+0x56/0x80 [nfsv4]
> [<ffffffffa064acd0>] _nfs4_proc_getattr+0xb0/0xc0 [nfsv4]
> [<ffffffff8123f8b2>] path_lookupat+0xd2/0x100
> [<ffffffffa0655d9c>] nfs4_proc_getattr+0x5c/0xe0 [nfsv4]
> [<ffffffffa0612120>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xa0/0x300 [nfs]
> [<ffffffffa0612485>] nfs_getattr+0x95/0x250 [nfs]
> [<ffffffff812365eb>] vfs_statx+0x7b/0xc0
> [<ffffffff81236a60>] SYSC_newstat+0x20/0x40
> [<ffffffff81687177>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xa9
> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> 
> I noted no _other_ misbehavior in either kernel, w/wo threadirqs.
> 
> 	-Mike

Interesting. I would guess virtio net does not complete some
packets. So you were unable to find an old guest where this
works fine?

-- 
MST