[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170410084939.4bwhrvpmauwfzauq@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:49:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] bug: Avoid setting BUGFLAG_WARNING twice
[resend, with Dan's actual email address]
Dan reported that his static checking complains about BUGFLAG_WARNING
being set on both sides of the bitwise-or, it figures that that might've
been an unintentional mistake.
Since there are no architectures that implement __WARN_TAINT() (I
converted them all to implement __WARN_FLAGS()), and all __WARN_FLAGS()
implementations already set BUGFLAG_WARNING, we can remove the bit from
BUGFLAG_TAINT() and make Dan's checker happy.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
include/asm-generic/bug.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bug.h b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
index 5fe9f39cec44..d6f4aed479a1 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
#define BUGFLAG_WARNING (1 << 0)
#define BUGFLAG_ONCE (1 << 1)
#define BUGFLAG_DONE (1 << 2)
-#define BUGFLAG_TAINT(taint) (BUGFLAG_WARNING | ((taint) << 8))
+#define BUGFLAG_TAINT(taint) ((taint) << 8)
#define BUG_GET_TAINT(bug) ((bug)->flags >> 8)
#endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists