[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170410160524.GA21109@fury>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:05:24 -0700
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, juri.lelli@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, xlpang@...hat.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
jdesfossez@...icios.com, bristot@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v6 13/13] futex: futex_lock_pi() vs PREEMPT_RT_FULL
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:08:18AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 07:26:10PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > Peter, I presume there will be a v7 with the u32 change and hopefully a couple
> > text updates?
>
> Well, tglx already committed these here patches, so no -v7. What I can
> do however is do a follow up patch that fixes some of the in-code things
> you mentioned.
>
> Something like the below is what I had lying about from your earlier
> emails; I've not looked to see if there's anything else from your later
> emails.
>
> ---
> Subject: futex: Small misc fixes..
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Date: Fri Apr 7 09:04:07 CEST 2017
>
> Feedback from Darren's review.
>
> Reported-by: Darren Hart (VMWare) <dvhart@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
OK, this addresses 2 of the big ones as I recall. I'll go through my feedback
and if I think anything else needs updating, I'll prepare a few patches.
Reviewed-by: Darren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@...radead.org>
Thanks Peter!
--
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists